Monday, December 12, 2011

Presentation


Roni Horn, You Are the Weather

Install View, You Are the Weather 1994/5, Tate Modern 2005







Melanie Schiff





Melanie Schiff, Spit Rainbow 
Melanie Schiff, Spit

Melanie Schiff, Neil Young, Neil Young, 2006, 30"x40"
Melanie Schiff, Untitled, 2004, 50"x40"







Christen Calloway



Untitled (shine) 

Untitled (distortion), 19"x13"


Untitled (hair)
Untitled (hammer)

Monday, December 5, 2011

Is Photo Over?

Of course not.


It's just changing.

I align myself with Jennifer Blessing, Peter Galassi, Geoff Dyer,Blake Stimson, Charlotte Cotton, Corey Keller, and Vince Aletti.

(My favorites in order are:

Peter Galassi
Jennifer Blessing
Geoff Dyer
Blake Stimson
Charlotte Cotton
Corey Keller
And I just agree with George Baker, because yeah, Expanded Field... yahta yahta yahta)


Photography will never die, it only changes form. Since photography is reliant on apparati, and the apparati constantly change, our medium is constantly in flux. From it's beginnings, photography has been changing modes of production ever few decades.  Now we're seeing new technology and everyone is screaming about the visceral qualities of analog, and whether or not photography is indexical any more, and how much better color is with analog. Yeah, I love analog too, but it's not going anywhere, with any action there is a reaction, and as the death of Polaroid has proven, if there is a will to resurrect the dead, there is a way. (I'm referring to The Impossible Project) When Polaroid announced it's closing, there was an immediate movement to save the process, and even Fuji came out with a camera, Fujifilm INSTAX 210, in response to the loss of Polaroid.

Art schools everywhere are getting rid of their color processors, Columbia University has, and SAIC has gone completely digital. We are lucky to have learned the processes, as we are the last to do so and it is part of photographic history. However, to stay stuck in the world of analog is silly, we have to move forward and change along with our ever changing medium. Paint is paint, it's not going anywhere, but an inherent quality of photography is that the processes and cameras and the ways of production change. We have the option to look at our processes and determine which makes the most sense for the work we are making and the ideas we want to convey. We have options, nothing is dead, and if color paper goes out, some grad student somewhere will be figuring out a way to resurrect it, as all process are still used, even the first, Daguerreotypes. We don't need to be concerned with processes, but instead we should be looking at where photography is going, and continually pushing the medium, questioning it, questioning where photography is shown and how it is seen.

Vince Aletti:

But when virtually every antique process — daguerreotype, tintype, and cyanotype; albumen, salt, platinum-palladium, and wet-plate collodion printing — has been revived over the past few decades, there's no reason to think gelatin silver will disappear totally anytime soon. There's never been just one kind of photography, and now there are many.

Source: http://www.sfmoma.org/about/research_projects/research_projects_photography_over#ixzz1fd5raFhd
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art



Photography is expanding, taking off really. We see more images today than we ever have before, we make more images than we ever have before, and we have more control over our image making. Not only is photography expanding into the digital world, it is also expanding into other forms of art making: video (Wafaa Balil, ) , painting (Ben Gest, Randy Hayes, Moni K Huber, Gregory Scott), installation (Amanda Ross-Ho, Wolfgang Tillmans, Christian Boltanski), and everything in between.



wafaa bilal midwest olympia
Midwest Olympia by Wafaa Bilal, http://wafaabilal.com/html/midwestOlympia.html
Big Apple Inn
Add caption

Zimmerhelden install view, Moni K Huber (painting, photo, and installation!)

Margaret with a Smaller Purse, 2005, Ben Gest

Big Apple Inn
Big Apple Inn, from American South by Randy Hayes 1995-2005

Flipside, Gregory Scott
<b>Reflexion</b>, 2000 Image
Coming and Going Part II, 2001, Christian Boltanski

Installation view

<b>Etre a Nouveau</b>, 2005 Image
Etre A Nouveau, 2005, Christian Boltanski

Untitled Still Life (DEEP DISH APPLE PIE), Amanda Ross-Ho 2011, (painting, photo, install, found object...)

Install view of The Artist's Museum (MCA @ LA), Amanda Ross-Ho, 2010-2011
Istall view from MMK, 2011, Wolfgang Tillmans

Install view from MMK, 2011, Wolfgang Tillmans
Christian Patterson (in the museum downstairs right now (MoCP), installation, found objects)

Stuffed Toy Poodle
I Pledge Allegation
Christian Patterson


Aside from photography expanding into other mediums and other mediums expanding into photography, we also have the use of the appropriation of images, so digital and social media come into the new medium of photography, not just as space to view images, but from which to take inspiration and make art.
Flickr Sunsets, Penelope Umbrico

treetops_artworkimage.jpg.jpeg
Treetops, from Somewhere in Israel, by Curtis Mann 2009
#32.700542, Dallas, TX. 2009. 2010, Doug Rickard
Photography will never die, just change and expand. I think this is an exciting time for us, we're in the middle of the death of one process and the beginning of a new, globalized, digitized process. The possibilities are endless and we are the pioneers. History doesn't stop.


(I'll add more later, maybe quotes and who I agree and disagree with )












Sunday, November 27, 2011

For Whitney

Was just introduced to this kick-ass Canadian hip-hop artist, Shad.

(Thanks Dan Green)

 Whitney, if you already know about him, you're my hero.

Here is his video Rose Garden:





Which references this video, Drop by Pharcyde, directed by Spike Jonze:




Snippet of my performance piece on Black Friday

This is not the end product by any means, but here's a little snippet:


Sunday, November 20, 2011

Amanda Ross-Ho talking about her work...

Expansion (unfinished)

George Bakers essay is basically about the relationship between photography and cinema and how both mediums have expanded into each other. It is summed up in these graphs:

normal.img-010.jpgnormal.img-012.jpg

Also, he states that instead of trying to get back to the good ole days of photography (sounds like the film vs digital debate), we should be constantly pushing the medium. I totally agree. Why do we want to reinvent the wheel people?



MoMA's New Photography exhibitions seem to display photographers that are pushing what photography is and what it means. Also, many of them seem to push against the notion of what we have learned at Columbia as to what a "good" photograph is, or that we should have "a [visually] cohesive body of work"and it is refreshing. Here are some images from photographers in the New Photography show at MoMA from 2011, 2010, 2009:

Viviane Sassen. Belladonna. 2010. Pigmented inkjet print, 39 3/8 x 49 3/16" (100 x 125 cm).

Viviane Sassen. Mimi. 2006. Pigmented inkjet print, 19 11/16 x 15 3/4" (50 x 40 cm). 

Viviane Sassen. Testament. 2011. Pigmented inkjet print, 31 1/2 x 25 9/16" (80 x 65 cm).
Doug Rickard, an interesting thoughts on "digital" through the use of Google maps... here's MoMA's artist info on him:


Doug Rickard (American, born 1968) studied United States history and sociology at the University of California, San Diego, before moving to photography. He has drawn on this background in research for his series A New American Picture, which focuses on places in the United States where unemployment is high and educational opportunities are few. On a virtual road trip, Rickard located these sites remotely using the Street View feature of the website Google Maps, which has mapped and photographed every street in the country. Scrutinizing the Google Maps pictures, he composed images on his computer screen, which he then photographed using a digital camera. The resulting pictures—digitally manipulated to remove the Google watermark and cropped to a panoramic format—comment on poverty and racial equity in the United States, the bounty of images on the web, and issues of personal privacy.


Doug Rickard. #32.700542, Dallas, TX. 2009. 2010. Pigmented inkjet print, 20 3/4 x 33 1/4" (52.7 x 84.5 cm). 
Doug Rickard. #34.546147, Helena-West Helena, AR. 2008. 2010. Pigmented inkjet print, 20 3/4 x 33 1/4" (52.7 x 84.5 cm).



Moyra Davey. The Coffee Shop, The Library. 2011. Chromogenic color prints, Dimensions variable. 
Moyra Davey. Rester Calme. 2010 (detail). Chromogenic color prints, Dimensions variable.

Moyra Davey, Rester Calme. 2010 (detail). Chromogenic color prints, Dimensions variable.
Deana Lawson. <i>Roxie and Raquel.</i> 2010. Pigmented inkjet print, 30 15/16 x 38 9/16" (78.6 x 97.9 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Fund for the Twenty-First Century. © 2011 Deana Lawson
Deana Lawson. Roxie and Raquel. 2010. Pigmented inkjet print, 30 15/16 x 38 9/16" (78.6 x 97.9 cm). 

Amanda Ross-Ho, installation view of HALF OF WHAT I SAY IS MEANINGLESS, 2008
Amanda Ross-Ho Irreconcilable Indifferences 2010, Chromogenic color print. 44x34 in. 
Amanda Ross-Ho Law of the Excluded Middle 2007 Sheetrock, framed sheetrock, wood, gold plated chain, kitty litter, 62x48x25 in.
Amanda Ross-Ho Inside Job #2. 2010. Inkjet print on canvas, 100 x 72″ (254 x 182.9 cm). 
Amanda Ross-Ho. Expose for the Shadows, Develop for the Highlights (Perforated Sampler): White Light, Crewel Point, Triangle 208.33%, Glasses (His), Portrait (Hers). 2010. Hand-drilled Sheetrock, wood, latex paint, chromogenic color prints, CNC-cut acrylic, acrylic on canvas, 96 x 72 x 5″ (243.8 x 182.9 x 12.7 cm).

Elad Lassry...Not everybody is tableauin it anymore (and mural or tableau does not equal good art, don't forget!):
Elad Lassry Laminated Structure (For Her and Him) 2009. Gelatin silver print on chromogenic color print, 14 1/2 x 11 1/2″ (36.8 x 29.2 cm).

Elad Lassry Angela Ledgerwood 2009 14x11"
Roe Ethridge Studio with Red Bag. 2009. Chromogenic color print,
51 x 40″ (129.5 x 101.6 cm). 
Alex Prager....Cindy Sherman and pastiche anyone? Film+photo anyone?:
Alex Prager Despair, Film Still #1 2010 
Roe Ethridge. <i>Debora Muller with Tripod.</i> 2008. Chromogenic color print. 43 x 33" (109.2 x 83.8 cm). Private collection. © 2010 Roe Ethridge
Roe Ethridge. Debora Muller with Tripod. 2008. Chromogenic color print. 43 x 33" (109.2 x 83.8 cm).
Leslie Hewitt. <i>Riffs on Real Time.</i>  2002–05.
Chromogenic color print, 30 x 24" (76.2 x 61 cm).
The Museum of Modern Art, New York.
Fund for the Twenty-First Century. <br />© 2009 Leslie Hewitt
Leslie Hewitt. Riffs on Real Time.  2002–05. Chromogenic color print, 30 x 24" (76.2 x 61 cm). 
 Carter Mull. <i>Eleven.</i> 2009. Type-c print on metallic paper and type-r print, 21 x 22 1/8" (53.3 x 56.2 cm). Courtesy the artist and Marc Foxx, Los Angeles. © 2009 Carter Mull
Carter Mull. Eleven. 2009. Type-c print on metallic paper and type-r print, 21 x 22 1/8" (53.3 x 56.2 cm). 
Sterling Ruby. <i>Artaud.</i> 2007.
Chromogenic color print, 64 x 48" (162.6 x 121.9 cm).
The Museum of Modern Art, New York.
Fund for the Twenty-First Century.
Image courtesy the artist.  © 2009 Sterling Ruby
Sterling Ruby. Artaud. 2007. Chromogenic color print, 64 x 48" (162.6 x 121.9 cm). 
Sara VanDerBeek. <i>A Composition for Detroit.</i> 2009. Chromogenic color prints, left to right, panel 1: 65 x 48" (165.1 x 121.9 cm), panel 2: 65 x 43 1/2" (165.1 x 110.5 cm), panel 3: 65 x 48" (165.1 x 121.9 cm), panel 4: 65 x 47 1/2" (165.1 x 120.7 cm). Courtesy the artist and D'Amelio Terras, New York. © 2009 Sara VanDerBeek
Sara VanDerBeek. A Composition for Detroit. 2009. Chromogenic color prints, left to right, panel 1: 65 x 48" (165.1 x 121.9 cm), panel 2: 65 x 43 1/2" (165.1 x 110.5 cm), panel 3: 65 x 48" (165.1 x 121.9 cm), panel 4: 65 x 47 1/2" (165.1 x 120.7 cm).
Daniel Gordon. <i>Red Headed Woman.</i> 2008.
Chromogenic color print, 37 5/16 x 29 7/8" (94.8 x 75.9 cm).
The Museum of Modern Art, New York.
Fund for the Twenty-First Century.
Image courtesy the artist.  © 2009 Daniel Gordon
Daniel Gordon. Red Headed Woman. 2008. Chromogenic color print, 37 5/16 x 29 7/8" (94.8 x 75.9 cm). 
Walead Beshty. <i>Three Color Curl (CMY: Irvine, California, August 19, 2008, Fuji Crystal Archive Type C).</i> 2008. Color photographic paper, 97 5/8 x 51 1/8" (248 x 129.9 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Fund for the Twenty-First Century. Image courtesy the artist and Wallspace, New York. © 2009 Walead Beshty
Walead Beshty. Three Color Curl (CMY: Irvine, California, August 19, 2008, Fuji Crystal Archive Type C). 2008. Color photographic paper, 97 5/8 x 51 1/8" (248 x 129.9 cm).